Two tours, one sport
Tennis is unusual among global sports in having two entirely separate professional circuits that share the same stages. The ATP organises the men's tour, the WTA the women's, and they were founded within a year of each other in the early 1970s — the ATP in 1972, the WTA in 1973, the latter driven by Billie Jean King and the group of players who became known as the Original Nine.
What they do not organise is the part everyone watches most. The four Grand Slams belong to their host federations, which is why a Slam can change its rules without either tour's agreement, and why the four of them moved at such different speeds on equal prize money.
Side by side
| ATP | WTA | |
|---|---|---|
| Full name | Association of Tennis Professionals | Women's Tennis Association |
| Founded | 1972 | 1973 |
| Top tier below Slams | Masters 1000 (9 events) | WTA 1000 |
| Middle tiers | ATP 500, ATP 250 | WTA 500, WTA 250 |
| Feeder circuit | ATP Challenger Tour, ITF | WTA 125, ITF World Tour |
| Year-end final | ATP Finals (top 8) | WTA Finals (top 8) |
| Team competition | Davis Cup | Billie Jean King Cup |
| Grand Slam format | Best of 5 sets | Best of 3 sets |
| Format elsewhere | Best of 3 sets | Best of 3 sets |
The five-set question
The most visible difference is also the narrowest. Men play best-of-five sets at the Grand Slams and nowhere else — every ATP tour event, every Masters 1000, the ATP Finals itself, all best-of-three, exactly like the WTA. So for roughly 44 weeks of the year the two tours play an identical format.
That narrowness is what keeps the argument alive. Because best-of-five survives only at four tournaments, it reads less like a structural feature of men's tennis and more like a tradition that happened not to be reformed. Proposals go in both directions, and neither side has won.
Rankings and points
Both tours run a rolling 52-week ranking in which only a fixed number of your best results count, so points earned a year ago fall off and have to be defended. The specifics diverge: the number of counting results, which tournaments are compulsory, and the point values below Slam level are all set separately by each tour.
We keep the full tables on their own pages — ATP points and WTA points — because those numbers are revised more often than anything else in this article.
When the money became equal
Equal prize money at the Slams took thirty-four years to complete, and the order tells its own story.
| Grand Slam | Equal prize money from | Note |
|---|---|---|
| US Open | 1973 | First sporting event in the world to pay equally |
| Australian Open | 2001 | Second Slam to reach parity |
| Roland Garros | 2006 | Followed a decade of public pressure |
| Wimbledon | 2007 | Last of the four to equalise |
The US Open's 1973 decision came after Billie Jean King told organisers the women would not return without it, and made the tournament the first sporting event anywhere to pay men and women the same. Wimbledon, the last holdout, equalised in 2007. Below Slam level the tours are still working through the remaining gaps.
Davis Cup and Billie Jean King Cup
The national team competitions belong to the ITF rather than to either tour. Davis Cup, first played in 1900, is one of the oldest international team events in any sport. Its women's counterpart started in 1963 as the Federation Cup, was shortened to Fed Cup, and in 2020 became the Billie Jean King Cup — the first major global team competition to be named after a woman.